[App_rpt-users] 64 bit

hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com
Tue Feb 9 15:42:33 EST 2010


> 
> From: "Ken" <ke2n at cs.com>
> Date: 2010/02/09 Tue AM 10:21:49 PST
> To: "'Steve Gladden'" <steve at michiganbroadband.com>
> CC: app_rpt-users at qrvc.com
> Subject: Re: [App_rpt-users] 64 bit
> 
> Thanks Steve - see my question below
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Steve Gladden [mailto:steve at michiganbroadband.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 11:38 AM
> > To: Ken
> > Cc: app_rpt-users at qrvc.com
> > Subject: Re: [App_rpt-users] 64 bit
> > 
> > Hello Ken,
> > I've done it in the past by copying all of the scripts from
> > a live 32 bit system over to the 64 bit system.
> > I first did all of the Centos updates on the 64 bit system..
> > 
> > Then I ran the stage2 script on the 64bit system..
> 
> =====
> I would probably need more help with this than you could provide-
> But, can you clarify - does this result in a "normal" 32 bit APP_RPT running
> under the 64 bit OS?
> 
> Or does it use the 64 bit compiler, creating a 64-bit version of the
> "forked" Asterisk code?
> (This latter one sounds like it has some risk of not working).
> 
> Ken Jamrogowicz
> 
> _______________________________________________
> App_rpt-users mailing list
> App_rpt-users at qrvc.com
> http://qrvc.com/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
> 

You'll get 64 bit code of the forked version it it compiles without errors. It may work or it may not work I don't know. You would be on your own and we would not be able to support such a build as it is outside of the scope of the project.

Steve
WA6ZFT







More information about the App_rpt-users mailing list