[App_rpt-users] 64 bit

hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com
Wed Feb 10 17:38:11 EST 2010


> 
> From: "Scott Weis" <kb2ear at kb2ear.net>
> Date: 2010/02/10 Wed PM 12:28:03 PST
> To: app_rpt-users at qrvc.com
> Subject: Re: [App_rpt-users] 64 bit
> 
> Just for fun I installed a 64-bit Centos on a machine and ran the phase1.sh 
> script etc. When it completed I had a fully 64 bit version up and running 
> with URI.
> 
> 73 de
> Scott KB2EAR
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <hwstar at rodgers.sdcoxmail.com>
> To: "Ken" <ke2n at cs.com>; "'Steve Gladden'" <steve at michiganbroadband.com>
> Cc: <app_rpt-users at qrvc.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 3:42 PM
> Subject: Re: [App_rpt-users] 64 bit
> 
> 
> >
> >>
> >> From: "Ken" <ke2n at cs.com>
> >> Date: 2010/02/09 Tue AM 10:21:49 PST
> >> To: "'Steve Gladden'" <steve at michiganbroadband.com>
> >> CC: app_rpt-users at qrvc.com
> >> Subject: Re: [App_rpt-users] 64 bit
> >>
> >> Thanks Steve - see my question below
> >>
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Steve Gladden [mailto:steve at michiganbroadband.com]
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 11:38 AM
> >> > To: Ken
> >> > Cc: app_rpt-users at qrvc.com
> >> > Subject: Re: [App_rpt-users] 64 bit
> >> >
> >> > Hello Ken,
> >> > I've done it in the past by copying all of the scripts from
> >> > a live 32 bit system over to the 64 bit system.
> >> > I first did all of the Centos updates on the 64 bit system..
> >> >
> >> > Then I ran the stage2 script on the 64bit system..
> >>
> >> =====
> >> I would probably need more help with this than you could provide-
> >> But, can you clarify - does this result in a "normal" 32 bit APP_RPT 
> >> running
> >> under the 64 bit OS?
> >>
> >> Or does it use the 64 bit compiler, creating a 64-bit version of the
> >> "forked" Asterisk code?
> >> (This latter one sounds like it has some risk of not working).
> >>
> >> Ken Jamrogowicz
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> App_rpt-users mailing list
> >> App_rpt-users at qrvc.com
> >> http://qrvc.com/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
> >>
> >
> > You'll get 64 bit code of the forked version it it compiles without 
> > errors. It may work or it may not work I don't know. You would be on your 
> > own and we would not be able to support such a build as it is outside of 
> > the scope of the project.
> >
> > Steve
> > WA6ZFT
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > App_rpt-users mailing list
> > App_rpt-users at qrvc.com
> > http://qrvc.com/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
> >
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> App_rpt-users mailing list
> App_rpt-users at qrvc.com
> http://qrvc.com/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
> 

That may appear to be true, but without testing every last feature and configuration you won't know for sure. I'm hesitant to call something good when it was built and only briefly tested. However, if enough people test their specific configurations and have a positive experience then maybe it is mostly good. 

Steve
WA6ZFT





More information about the App_rpt-users mailing list