[App_rpt-users] Outbound call problem! Unable to handle indication 13

Pawlowski, Adam ajp26 at buffalo.edu
Mon Jul 18 11:38:20 EDT 2016


This is what I have for my node:

add action=dst-nat chain=dstnat comment="Allstar Link IAX2" dst-port=4569 in-interface=ether1-gateway protocol=udp to-addresses=192.168.1.120 to-ports=4569
add action=dst-nat chain=dstnat comment="Allstarlink chan_echolink" dst-port=5198-5199 in-interface=ether1-gateway protocol=udp to-addresses=192.168.1.120 to-ports=5198-5199
add action=dst-nat chain=dstnat comment="Allstarlink SIP" dst-port=5060 in-interface=ether1-gateway protocol=udp to-addresses=192.168.1.120 to-ports=5060
add action=dst-nat chain=dstnat comment="Allstarlink RTP" dst-port=10000-65535 in-interface=ether1-gateway protocol=udp to-addresses=192.168.1.120 to-ports=10000-65535

I am not running a src nat for the IAX port outbound. I have the rule in the chain but disabled, so I must have determined I didn't need it.

It either does PAT correctly in the background, or isn't natting that port:

220controller*CLI> iax2 show registry
Host                  dnsmgr  Username    Perceived             Refresh  State
67.215.233.178:4569   Y       27709       67.242.153.201:4569        60  Registered

I installed the MicroTIK router to replace an Adtran device which was utter trash and refused to do a static PAT, and it's been working swell since, to the best of my knowledge.

If there's some reason I should be doing a source NAT for that port, I guess, let me know? I suppose it would only make a difference if I'm operating multiple nodes and didn't want to connect them together internally.

Regards,


Adam
KC2YQF



More information about the App_rpt-users mailing list